HowreliableUsed car reliability from every MOT
CarsSuzuki Swift
MOT results · tests in 2025 · Great Britain

Suzuki Swift reliability: what the MOT shows

134,483 Swifts had an MOT in 2025. 72.3% passed first time, against 73.2% for other cars of the same age and mileage. Those registered from 2022 onwards pass more often than other cars their age.

72.3%passed first time
−0.9points against cars of the same age and mileage
1.4×as many brake failures as comparable cars
Report card

Suzuki Swift MOT results by registration year

Each dot compares how often Swifts of that year failed on one area of the test with cars of the same age and mileage.

Much betterBetterAbout the sameWorseMuch worse
YearPassed first timeAgainst same age and mileageMOTsSuspensionSteeringBrakesTyresLights & electricsVisibilityBody & structureEmissions & leaks
200548.6%−9.31,083
200650.5%−6.93,329
200751.1%−6.96,000
200852.1%−5.66,449
200954.1%−5.06,265
201055.8%−4.75,687
201161.4%−1.16,065
201264.5%−0.28,858
201367.9%+0.58,698
201470.8%+0.110,067
201574.3%+0.412,336
201676.2%−0.710,406
201779.9%−0.38,065
201883.9%+1.410,126
201986.6%+1.610,949
202088.4%+1.07,994
202189.5%+0.67,495
202293.2%+3.34,611

Much worse: failed on that area at least 1.5 times as often. Worse: 1.15 to 1.5 times. Better: up to 0.87 times. Much better: two-thirds as often or less. Gaps under half a percentage point count as about the same. Registration year is the year the car was first used.

Suzuki Swift years to avoid, going by the MOT

Well behind2005 to 2009−5.0 to −9.3 ptsMost common failure in every one of these years: position lamp (not working). 23,126 MOTs.
Behind2010−4.7 ptsMost common failure: position lamp (not working). 5,687 MOTs.
Level2011 to 2018−1.1 to +1.4 ptsMost common failures: position lamp (not working) in 2011, 2012, 2014, 2015 and 2016; stop lamp (not working) in 2013; coil spring (fractured or broken) in 2017 and 2018. 74,621 MOTs.
Ahead2019+1.6 ptsMost common failure: wipers (does not clear the windscreen effectively). 10,949 MOTs.
Level2020 to 2021+0.6 to +1.0 ptsMost common failure in every one of these years: wipers (does not clear the windscreen effectively). 15,489 MOTs.
Ahead2022+3.3 ptsMost common failure: wipers (does not clear the windscreen effectively). 4,611 MOTs.

Well behind: 5 or more points below cars of the same age and mileage. Behind: 1.5 to 5 points below. Level: within 1.5 points. Ahead: 1.5 or more points above.

What fails

Suzuki Swift common faults at the MOT

8.2% of Swift MOTs failed on brakes, against 5.8% for cars of the same age and mileage, and 5.6% on visibility, against 4.2%.

Most common failures

Position lamp: not working4.8%Cars of the same age and mileage: 2.3%
Stop lamp: not working4.0%Cars of the same age and mileage: 1.8%
Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively3.3%Cars of the same age and mileage: 1.9%
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm2.1%Cars of the same age and mileage: 2.0%
Coil spring: fractured or broken2.1%Cars of the same age and mileage: 2.4%
Rigid brake pipes: excessively corroded2.0%Cars of the same age and mileage: 0.5%
Rbt (sp): efficiency below requirements1.8%Cars of the same age and mileage: 0.9%
Ball joint excessively worn1.5%Cars of the same age and mileage: 1.3%
SwiftSame age and mileage

Fails more often than other cars

Rigid brake pipes: excessively corroded4.2×1.99% of Swift MOTs (2,682) against 0.47% for cars of the same age and mileage
Pins and bushes: pin or bush excessively worn3.7×0.21% of Swift MOTs (288) against 0.06% for cars of the same age and mileage
Macpherson strut: top bush or bearing has excessive wear or free play3.6×0.31% of Swift MOTs (419) against 0.09% for cars of the same age and mileage
Hand lever: has insufficient reserve travel3.6×0.40% of Swift MOTs (531) against 0.11% for cars of the same age and mileage
Lever: has excessive movement indicating incorrect adjustment3.3×0.58% of Swift MOTs (783) against 0.18% for cars of the same age and mileage
Service brake imbalance: across an axle2.6×0.60% of Swift MOTs (801) against 0.23% for cars of the same age and mileage
Mileage

The gap opens after 90,000 miles

Up to 90,000 miles, Swifts pass as often as cars of the same age and mileage. Behind from there: 90–120,000 miles 4.1 points, 120,000+ miles 6.7 points.

First-time MOT pass rate by mileage: Suzuki Swift against cars of the same age and mileage0%25%50%75%100%9088UNDER 30K+1.2 pts807930–60K+1.3 pts656760–90K−1.8 pts555990–120K−4.1 pts5157120K+−6.7 pts
Swift, first-time pass rateCars of the same age and mileage

Petrol, diesel or hybrid Swift

Diesels passed 53.5% first time, 7.4 points below comparable cars; petrols passed 68.9%, 1.3 points below comparable cars. Diesels had a median of 99,504 miles at the test, against 65,676 for petrols. Hybrids are mostly newer cars (median 28,278 miles), so compare them with care.

FuelMOTsPassed first timeSame age and mileageGap (pts)Median miles
Petrol107,31268.9%70.2%−1.365,676
Hybrid22,10088.8%86.9%+1.928,278
Other2,76889.5%89.1%+0.520,927
Diesel2,30153.5%60.9%−7.499,504
Against rivals

Swift against other small hatchbacks

Cars registered 2014 to 2021, each against cars of the same age and mileage. The Swift ranks 6 of 17.

ModelMOTsPassed first timeSame age and mileageGap (pts)
1. Honda Jazz136,22787.4%82.0%+5.4
2. MINI Cooper339,52785.3%80.8%+4.5
3. Toyota Yaris215,96482.4%80.7%+1.6
4. Hyundai i2077,31979.6%78.7%+0.9
5. Mazda 260,28480.6%79.8%+0.9
6. Suzuki Swift77,43880.6%80.1%+0.5
7. Audi A1162,41178.5%78.7%−0.2
8. Skoda Fabia118,92477.9%79.3%−1.3
9. VW Polo329,62176.0%79.1%−3.1
10. Ford Fiesta693,78873.2%78.2%−4.9
11. Citroen C395,14373.8%80.1%−6.2
12. Seat Ibiza113,18571.2%77.6%−6.4
13. Peugeot 208157,34971.7%78.8%−7.1
14. Nissan Micra81,54373.4%81.0%−7.6
15. Vauxhall Corsa477,34870.1%78.7%−8.6
16. Dacia Sandero97,35567.1%79.5%−12.4
17. Renault Clio148,25663.9%78.1%−14.2

Check these before you buy a used Swift

What testers most often noted as advisories on Swifts in 2025: wear that passed but was close to failing. Figures in brackets are for cars of the same age and mileage.

Questions about Swift reliability

Is the Suzuki Swift reliable?

At the MOT, 72.3% of 134,483 Swift MOTs in 2025 passed first time, against 73.2% for cars of the same age and mileage. 2005 to 2009: well behind (−5.0 to −9.3 points). 2010: behind (−4.7 points). 2011 to 2018: level (−1.1 to +1.4 points). 2019: ahead (+1.6 points). 2020 to 2021: level (+0.6 to +1.0 points). 2022: ahead (+3.3 points).

Which Suzuki Swift years should I avoid?

Going by 2025 MOT results, 2005 to 2009 and 2010. Those cars passed first time −5.0 to −9.3 and −4.7 points against comparable cars.

What is the most common MOT failure on a Swift?

Position lamp: not working: 4.8% of Swift MOTs, against 2.3% for cars of the same age and mileage.

Is a diesel or petrol Swift more reliable?

Petrol Swifts passed 68.9% first time and diesels 53.5%. Against cars of the same age and mileage, petrols were 1.3 points below and diesels 7.4 points below.

Is the Swift more reliable than the Ford Fiesta?

For cars registered 2014 to 2021, the Ford Fiesta passed 73.2% first time, −4.9 points against comparable cars. The Swift passed 80.6%, +0.5 points.

How we measure

Data. Every car MOT in Great Britain in 2025 (31,475,521 first tests on cars first used 2005 to 2022), from DVSA's anonymised MOT test data. Retests are left out.

Passed first time. A car passed if its first test that year ended in a pass. Cars that failed and were fixed within the hour count as fails, as DVSA counts them.

Same age and mileage. We group every car by the year it was first used and its mileage (under 30k, 30–60k, 60–90k, 90–120k, over 120k). The comparison figure is what those groups scored, weighted to match the Swift's mix of ages and mileages.

Model. Every car DVSA records as a Suzuki Swift: 21 recorded model names, from "SWIFT" to trims such as "SWIFT SZ-L DUALJET MHEV".

The full method, including how each report-card dot and year group is decided.