HowreliableUsed car reliability from every MOT
CarsLand Rover Discovery
MOT results · tests in 2025 · Great Britain

Land Rover Discovery reliability: what the MOT shows

126,302 Discoveries had an MOT in 2025. 76.7% passed first time, against 68.8% for other cars of the same age and mileage. That is 7.9 points better than comparable cars.

76.7%passed first time
+7.9points against cars of the same age and mileage
126,302MOTs in 2025
Report card

Land Rover Discovery MOT results by registration year

Each dot compares how often Discoveries of that year failed on one area of the test with cars of the same age and mileage.

Much betterBetterAbout the sameWorseMuch worse
YearPassed first timeAgainst same age and mileageMOTsSuspensionSteeringBrakesTyresLights & electricsVisibilityBody & structureEmissions & leaks
200564.8%+10.36,729
200662.1%+8.06,562
200763.9%+9.25,637
200864.7%+10.34,296
200966.8%+11.74,739
201070.4%+14.15,910
201171.3%+12.95,712
201272.7%+12.56,478
201374.1%+11.76,174
201476.8%+11.47,281
201579.6%+10.89,028
201680.5%+8.39,566
201781.8%+5.99,718
201885.5%+7.08,449
201986.1%+5.07,882
202086.0%+2.16,195
202185.9%−0.19,453
202285.5%−2.06,493

Much worse: failed on that area at least 1.5 times as often. Worse: 1.15 to 1.5 times. Better: up to 0.87 times. Much better: two-thirds as often or less. Gaps under half a percentage point count as about the same. Registration year is the year the car was first used.

Land Rover Discovery years to avoid, going by the MOT

Ahead2005 to 2020+2.1 to +14.1 ptsMost common failures: position lamp (not working) in 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008; pins and bushes (pin or bush excessively worn) in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014; registration plate lamp(s) (inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps) in 2015 and 2016; ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt in 2017; condition (has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords) in 2018, 2019 and 2020. 110,356 MOTs.
Level2021−0.1 ptsMost common failure: wipers (does not clear the windscreen effectively). 9,453 MOTs.
Behind2022−2.0 ptsMost common failure: condition (has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords). 6,493 MOTs.

Well behind: 5 or more points below cars of the same age and mileage. Behind: 1.5 to 5 points below. Level: within 1.5 points. Ahead: 1.5 or more points above.

What fails

Land Rover Discovery common faults at the MOT

1.4% of Discovery MOTs failed on seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, against 1.3% for cars of the same age and mileage, and 4.2% on body and structure, against 4.2%.

Most common failures

Pins and bushes: pin or bush excessively worn3.2%Cars of the same age and mileage: 1.5%
Condition: has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords1.9%Cars of the same age and mileage: 1.5%
Brake pads: less than 1.5 mm thick1.8%Cars of the same age and mileage: 2.1%
Position lamp: not working1.6%Cars of the same age and mileage: 3.2%
Registration plate lamp(s): inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps1.5%Cars of the same age and mileage: 1.4%
Joints: constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt1.4%Cars of the same age and mileage: 1.8%
Rigid brake pipes: excessively corroded1.4%Cars of the same age and mileage: 0.6%
Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively1.3%Cars of the same age and mileage: 1.9%
DiscoverySame age and mileage

Fails more often than other cars

Prop shaft: bearing excessively worn41.6×1.05% of Discovery MOTs (1,330) against 0.03% for cars of the same age and mileage
Operation: system inoperative30.1×0.24% of Discovery MOTs (299) against 0.01% for cars of the same age and mileage
Flexible couplings: excessively deteriorated20.3×0.21% of Discovery MOTs (270) against 0.01% for cars of the same age and mileage
Electronic parking brake: control inoperative18.7×0.30% of Discovery MOTs (380) against 0.02% for cars of the same age and mileage
Electronic parking brake: warning indicates a malfunction13.8×0.33% of Discovery MOTs (413) against 0.02% for cars of the same age and mileage
Decelerometer (sp): efficiency less than 50% of the required value11.6×0.32% of Discovery MOTs (399) against 0.03% for cars of the same age and mileage
Mileage

First-time pass rate by mileage

Against cars of the same age and mileage, in points: Under 30k: −2.1, 30–60k: +2.4, 60–90k: +8.7, 90–120k: +10.8, 120k+: +10.2.

First-time MOT pass rate by mileage: Land Rover Discovery against cars of the same age and mileage0%25%50%75%100%8890UNDER 30K−2.1 pts858330–60K+2.4 pts837460–90K+8.7 pts756590–120K+10.8 pts6858120K++10.2 pts
Discovery, first-time pass rateCars of the same age and mileage

Petrol, diesel or hybrid Discovery

Diesels passed 76.6% first time, 8.3 points above comparable cars; petrols passed 80.8%, 3.2 points above comparable cars. Diesels had a median of 100,291 miles at the test, against 52,419 for petrols. Hybrids are mostly newer cars (median 34,950 miles), so compare them with care.

FuelMOTsPassed first timeSame age and mileageGap (pts)Median miles
Diesel121,35876.6%68.3%+8.3100,291
Hybrid2,74481.8%86.7%−4.934,950
Petrol2,13280.8%77.6%+3.252,419
Against rivals

Discovery against other premium SUVs

Cars registered 2014 to 2021, each against cars of the same age and mileage. The Discovery ranks 4 of 18.

ModelMOTsPassed first timeSame age and mileageGap (pts)
1. Range Rover39,88085.2%76.5%+8.7
2. Audi Q585,22785.7%77.9%+7.8
3. Range Rover Sport75,07784.2%77.2%+7.0
4. Land Rover Discovery67,57282.7%76.4%+6.3
5. Jaguar I-Pace17,78091.1%85.4%+5.8
6. BMW X182,17584.9%79.3%+5.7
7. Range Rover Evoque148,57383.4%78.1%+5.2
8. BMW X372,12584.4%79.2%+5.2
9. Audi Q3110,45583.4%78.2%+5.1
10. Volvo XC6090,52681.8%76.8%+5.0
11. Volvo XC9040,59183.5%78.5%+5.0
12. Volvo XC4071,16889.6%85.4%+4.1
13. Jaguar F-Pace53,34584.6%80.5%+4.1
14. Land Rover Defender26,70784.0%80.4%+3.6
15. Jaguar E-Pace31,25287.1%83.6%+3.5
16. Land Rover Discovery Sport109,16181.0%77.7%+3.2
17. Mercedes GLA86,40382.8%80.2%+2.6
18. Range Rover Velar32,71684.3%82.2%+2.1

Check these before you buy a used Discovery

What testers most often noted as advisories on Discoveries in 2025: wear that passed but was close to failing. Figures in brackets are for cars of the same age and mileage.

Questions about Discovery reliability

Is the Land Rover Discovery reliable?

At the MOT, 76.7% of 126,302 Discovery MOTs in 2025 passed first time, against 68.8% for cars of the same age and mileage. 2005 to 2020: ahead (+2.1 to +14.1 points). 2021: level (−0.1 points). 2022: behind (−2.0 points).

Which Land Rover Discovery years should I avoid?

Going by 2025 MOT results, 2022. Those cars passed first time −2.0 points against comparable cars.

What is the most common MOT failure on a Discovery?

Pins and bushes: pin or bush excessively worn: 3.2% of Discovery MOTs, against 1.5% for cars of the same age and mileage.

Is a diesel or petrol Discovery more reliable?

Petrol Discoveries passed 80.8% first time and diesels 76.6%. Against cars of the same age and mileage, petrols were 3.2 points above and diesels 8.3 points above.

Is the Discovery more reliable than the Range Rover Evoque?

For cars registered 2014 to 2021, the Range Rover Evoque passed 83.4% first time, +5.2 points against comparable cars. The Discovery passed 82.7%, +6.3 points.

How we measure

Data. Every car MOT in Great Britain in 2025 (31,475,521 first tests on cars first used 2005 to 2022), from DVSA's anonymised MOT test data. Retests are left out.

Passed first time. A car passed if its first test that year ended in a pass. Cars that failed and were fixed within the hour count as fails, as DVSA counts them.

Same age and mileage. We group every car by the year it was first used and its mileage (under 30k, 30–60k, 60–90k, 90–120k, over 120k). The comparison figure is what those groups scored, weighted to match the Discovery's mix of ages and mileages.

Model. Every car DVSA records as a Land Rover Discovery: 65 recorded model names, from "DISCOVERY" to trims such as "DISCOVERY R-DYNAM HSE D MHEV A".

The full method, including how each report-card dot and year group is decided.