269,017 Aygos had an MOT in 2025. 75.8% passed first time, against 75.7% for other cars of the same age and mileage. Those registered from 2022 onwards pass more often than other cars their age.
Each dot compares how often Aygos of that year failed on one area of the test with cars of the same age and mileage.
| Year | Passed first time | Against same age and mileage | MOTs | Suspension | Steering | Brakes | Tyres | Lights & electrics | Visibility | Body & structure | Emissions & leaks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 48.5% | −9.4 | 1,193 | ||||||||
| 2006 | 51.2% | −6.6 | 6,624 | ||||||||
| 2007 | 52.9% | −5.9 | 8,289 | ||||||||
| 2008 | 53.5% | −5.7 | 10,355 | ||||||||
| 2009 | 58.5% | −2.3 | 12,045 | ||||||||
| 2010 | 59.3% | −2.8 | 11,303 | ||||||||
| 2011 | 60.7% | −3.8 | 12,537 | ||||||||
| 2012 | 63.7% | −2.9 | 14,571 | ||||||||
| 2013 | 68.1% | −1.1 | 15,053 | ||||||||
| 2014 | 73.8% | +1.7 | 19,282 | ||||||||
| 2015 | 80.1% | +4.7 | 23,121 | ||||||||
| 2016 | 82.3% | +3.9 | 22,094 | ||||||||
| 2017 | 84.1% | +2.7 | 21,391 | ||||||||
| 2018 | 85.5% | +1.6 | 21,899 | ||||||||
| 2019 | 86.0% | −0.1 | 22,082 | ||||||||
| 2020 | 86.9% | −1.2 | 16,538 | ||||||||
| 2021 | 89.5% | +0.2 | 17,027 | ||||||||
| 2022 | 94.1% | +3.8 | 13,613 |
Much worse: failed on that area at least 1.5 times as often. Worse: 1.15 to 1.5 times. Better: up to 0.87 times. Much better: two-thirds as often or less. Gaps under half a percentage point count as about the same. Registration year is the year the car was first used.
Well behind: 5 or more points below cars of the same age and mileage. Behind: 1.5 to 5 points below. Level: within 1.5 points. Ahead: 1.5 or more points above.
7.2% of Aygo MOTs failed on brakes, against 5.0% for cars of the same age and mileage, and 10.0% on lights and electrics, against 8.7%.
Up to 90,000 miles, Aygos pass as often as cars of the same age and mileage. Behind from there: 90–120,000 miles 4.0 points, 120,000+ miles 7.8 points.
Cars registered 2014 to 2021, each against cars of the same age and mileage. The Aygo ranks 1 of 5.
| Model | MOTs | Passed first time | Same age and mileage | Gap (pts) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Toyota Aygo | 163,434 | 83.4% | 81.5% | +1.8 | |
| 2. VW up! | 93,028 | 81.0% | 79.5% | +1.4 | |
| 3. Hyundai i10 | 144,670 | 79.1% | 80.8% | −1.7 | |
| 4. Kia Picanto | 107,422 | 79.4% | 82.2% | −2.7 | |
| 5. Fiat 500 | 212,496 | 71.9% | 79.7% | −7.8 |
What testers most often noted as advisories on Aygos in 2025: wear that passed but was close to failing. Figures in brackets are for cars of the same age and mileage.
At the MOT, 75.8% of 269,017 Aygo MOTs in 2025 passed first time, against 75.7% for cars of the same age and mileage. 2005 to 2008: well behind (−5.7 to −9.4 points). 2009 to 2012: behind (−2.3 to −3.8 points). 2013: level (−1.1 points). 2014 to 2018: ahead (+1.6 to +4.7 points). 2019 to 2021: level (+0.2 to −1.2 points). 2022: ahead (+3.8 points).
Going by 2025 MOT results, 2005 to 2008 and 2009 to 2012. Those cars passed first time −5.7 to −9.4 and −2.3 to −3.8 points against comparable cars.
Wipers: does not clear the windscreen effectively: 2.5% of Aygo MOTs, against 1.9% for cars of the same age and mileage.
For cars registered 2014 to 2021, the Fiat 500 passed 71.9% first time, −7.8 points against comparable cars. The Aygo passed 83.4%, +1.8 points.
Data. Every car MOT in Great Britain in 2025 (31,475,521 first tests on cars first used 2005 to 2022), from DVSA's anonymised MOT test data. Retests are left out.
Passed first time. A car passed if its first test that year ended in a pass. Cars that failed and were fixed within the hour count as fails, as DVSA counts them.
Same age and mileage. We group every car by the year it was first used and its mileage (under 30k, 30–60k, 60–90k, 90–120k, over 120k). The comparison figure is what those groups scored, weighted to match the Aygo's mix of ages and mileages.
Model. Every car DVSA records as a Toyota Aygo: 22 recorded model names, from "AYGO" to trims such as "AYGO X EDGE VVT-I".
The full method, including how each report-card dot and year group is decided.